Remember the National Lampoon Magazine in the 1970's that threatened to "Kill This Dog" unless we bought the magazine? A couple of times recently I've come across similar threats...like NASA's proposal for the International Space Station that we've spent $100-Billion on...fly it into the Pacific in 2016 unless we come up with more operating cash.Even closer to the National Lampoon cover was The Boston Zoo's weekend threat to not only shut down operations, but to kill some of the animals too unless they get more funding. "Fund This Zoo or We'll Shoot This Llama?"
To me, convincing folks to do something by threat always seems a bit over the top, so let me suggest modifications. Instead of threatening to send the space station to the bottom of the sea, NASA can say it will have to start renting it out for church services..."Get your flock truly closer to God!" That will get the Liberals in an uproar and make the Conservatives mad too, as they fight over which denomination should go first. And as for the Boston Zoo...instead of threatening to kill the critters, just say unless more funding is forthcoming, we'll have to open the cages and let the animals find their own dinner. Lions and Tigers and Llamas on the Commons, oh my!


Wrap the front page in a look alike "wrapper", logo/masthead and all, that is really an ad? No problem said the L.A. Times and our own Anniston Star. Hack into private cell phone conversations and records? Full speed ahead said NewsCorp (allegedly). When staff cuts at an Alabama TV newsroom causes staff to plummet from about 90 people to about 30, but the number of newscasts stays the same...how many ethical lines will be crossed to keep producing "news"? I'll bet this is a great time to be producing VNRs (Video News Releases). Stations are probably inhaling, without so much as a word to viewers that they were produced by interested parties. And frankly, it's a tough time to take a hard line. I know where those reporter salaries come from. And its not subscription income.






