Aug 10, 2009

Math Problem: Tax-Free Weekend & TBOH Events

It is with some trepidation that I venture into math somewhat more complex than needed to balance a checkbook, but...am I the only one who wonders about the math used to pronounce the "Tax- Free Weekend" and "Take Back Our Highways" a big success?
Governor Riley says the sales tax elimination was great for parents and retailers in these tough times and the state actually collected MORE tax than it would have otherwise because people buy other taxable stuff too. The New York Times Regional Newspapers' Dana Beyerle's story is one that includes that claim from Riley. But some economists say it's smoke and mirrors, that Riley is counting spending that would have occurred anyway, but is shifted to the tax-free weekend because it is more convenient for shoppers. The Poynter Journalism site includes some guidance this morning about stories on the tax-free events that includes information about states that have canceled theirs this year.
And there was "Take Back Our Highway$". Isn't there a problem with the premise? The Alabama Department of Public Safety takes the week during 2008 in which there were the most traffic fatalities (18) and then stages its mass showdown during the same week this year. But since last year's deadly week wasn't associated with any holiday or other special event, isn't that a random event?...and comparing it to the same week in 2009 is meaningless? Can DPS really take credit for the seven fewer fatalities this year? They can take credit for lots of tickets: 7,657 for speeding,, 2,862 for not wearing seat-belts or child restraints, 2,495 for not having proof of insurance and 1,245 "Driver License Violations". They also made more serious arrests...185 DUI. Here's the complete list, courtesy DPS:
For the July 25-31 period:

2009 Total

2008 Total

Total (+/-)

Information

575

580

Accident

-5

259

237

Injuries

22

11

18

Fatalities

-7

Activity

185

114

DUI

71

7657

3503

Speed

4154

38

14

Reckless Driving

24

182

228

Following Too Close

-46

124

0

Improper lane change

124

6

48

Improper turn

-42

23

22

Failure to Yield Right of Way

1

80

185

Traffic Control Device

-105

2862

2196

Seat Belt / Child Restraint

666

2495

1657

Insurance

838

1245

797

Driver License Violations

448

1157

0

Other traffic violations

1157

335

0

Non Traffic Arrests

335

Warnings

1072

0

Speeding

1072

26

0

Seat Belt / Child Restraint

26

109

0

Driver License Violations

109

915

0

Other violations

915

Other contacts

530

423

Assist

107

19

0

Vehicle Searches

19

172

129

Incident Offense Reports

43

430

102

CMV Inspections

328

291361

217861

Miles driven

73500

The Proof of Insurance tickets alone could have brought in $1.2 Million (@ $500 per) though some tickets will be voided if the driver just didn't have his or her card with them...harder to tell about the speeding tickets since it varies by how fast the driver was going and the limit where the violation occurred. So...math geniuses out there? Are my suspicions correct? Let me hear from you! [PLUS: My fellow blogger Kris at The World Around You tackles another math problem this morning: Alabama's High School Dropout rate!]

2 comments:

  1. A percentage decrease/increase would've been nice, rather than the numerical difference between the two years.

    And imagine this: What would it be like if they (Troopers/DPS) actually did this ALL the time rather than a few select weeks? And those numbers are for the State Troopers, not to mention municipal/local and county LEOs.

    Might we actually see a decrease in traffic problems (moving violations, wrecks, fatalities, DUIs, etc.) and an increase in driver courtesy through a corresponding obedience to law?

    That's their charge anyway, isn't it? I mean, that's what we pay them to do - enforce the law. Right?

    Hmmmm... food for thought, no doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh... just wanted to add that a few weeks back I spoke personally to two Troopers in Madison county, one whom was posted roadside on a rural thoroughfare near where I reside.

    I expressed my gratitude to him for his presence, stating that IMO there have been too many speeding vehicles (POVs & COVs) along the route.

    He said the post recently changed their policy about allowing Troopers to use their best judgment about where they needed to patrol to _again_ allow them that professional decision.

    Both the officers were genuinely courteous, polite and IMO fantastic representatives of the state. I also called and commended them to their supervisor, whom, he said, usually receives more (unjustified & unwarranted) complaints from drivers exclusively because they were cited.

    For those whine-o's I say,

    "Well... duh!

    "You were busted so you bitch. Right?

    "Shut up, take your spanking, learn your lesson, and be thankful.

    "Next time, the wreck you cause will bankrupt you."

    ReplyDelete