As I get older, I am more and more leery of adopting trendy new phrases and words.
I think it started with the arrival of "gone viral".
I'm sure it was cool the first five billion times someone used it...but now? It became a cliche almost as soon as it was a week old. I cringe when I hear it now.
Sometimes old words are new, or rediscovered.
New to me, but maybe not to you, is a word I spotted in a NY Times column.
When it come to broadcast writing (or ad-libing) broadcasters rely on shop talk terms that mean nothing to viewers..for example..
I think it started with the arrival of "gone viral".
I'm sure it was cool the first five billion times someone used it...but now? It became a cliche almost as soon as it was a week old. I cringe when I hear it now.
Sometimes old words are new, or rediscovered.
New to me, but maybe not to you, is a word I spotted in a NY Times column.
adjective
- 1.(of two or more objects or events) not existing or happening at the same time.
When it come to broadcast writing (or ad-libing) broadcasters rely on shop talk terms that mean nothing to viewers..for example..
- "Tim has that package now"....which means he has the STORY now. (Newsrooms call a produced story a "package".)
- "John has that sound now..."...a double whammy that I hear on cable TV all of the time. "Sound" is actually a radio term for comments by a person who has been interviewed.
- "Welcome back", after a commercial break. Oh? Has the audience left? Or has the anchor gone someplace? Dumb comments that have no meaning but are convenient cliches that lazy newspeople use.
- "We'll be right back"....Oh, are you going somewhere? No, neither is the audience. The commercials are PART OF YOUR BROADCAST. They pay your salary.
This greatly impacted me. Thanks.
ReplyDelete